Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions spaces/S000217/README.md
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on $\omega$), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below $\omega_1$.

The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.

Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
---
uid: S000217
name: Left ray topology on $\omega_1$
refs:
- wikipedia: Alexandrov_topology
name: Alexandrov topology on Wikipedia
---

Let $X=\omega_1$, with a base for the topology consisting of the left rays
$[0,\alpha]=[0,\alpha+1)$ for $\alpha\in\omega_1$.

The open sets are the downward closed subsets of $X$, which are $X$, $\emptyset$,
the basic open sets above, and the rays $[0,\alpha)$ with $\alpha$ limit ordinal.
This is the Alexandrov topology for the reverse ordering on $\omega_1$.
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions spaces/S000217/properties/P000001.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
---
space: S000217
property: P000001
value: true
---

Given $\alpha<\beta$ in $X$, the open set $[0,\alpha]$ contains $\alpha$ and not $\beta$.
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions spaces/S000217/properties/P000093.md
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here.
I'll modify.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
---
space: S000217
property: P000093
value: true
---

Each basic open set of the form $[0,\alpha]$ for $\alpha\in\omega_1$ is countable.
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions spaces/S000217/properties/P000114.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
---
space: S000217
property: P000114
value: true
---

By construction.
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions spaces/S000217/properties/P000196.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
---
space: S000217
property: P000196
value: true
---

By construction.
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions spaces/S000217/properties/P000226.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
---
space: S000217
property: P000226
value: true
---

Since the ordinal numbers are well-ordered,
every nonempty collection of open sets has a minimal element.