-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
Left-ray topology on $\omega_1$ #1591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: S000217 | ||
| name: Left ray topology on $\omega_1$ | ||
| refs: | ||
| - wikipedia: Alexandrov_topology | ||
| name: Alexandrov topology on Wikipedia | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Let $X=\omega_1$, with a base for the topology consisting of the left rays | ||
| $[0,\alpha]=[0,\alpha+1)$ for $\alpha\in\omega_1$. | ||
|
|
||
| The open sets are the downward closed subsets of $X$, which are $X$, $\emptyset$, | ||
| the basic open sets above, and the rays $[0,\alpha)$ with $\alpha$ limit ordinal. | ||
| This is the Alexandrov topology for the reverse ordering on $\omega_1$. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| space: S000217 | ||
| property: P000001 | ||
| value: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Given $\alpha<\beta$ in $X$, the open set $[0,\alpha]$ contains $\alpha$ and not $\beta$. |
|
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I dont really like this, since the "basic open set" depends on a basis, but the basis isn't fixed or anything.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You are right. It was referring to the base described in the definition, but it's out of context here. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| space: S000217 | ||
| property: P000093 | ||
| value: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Each basic open set of the form $[0,\alpha]$ for $\alpha\in\omega_1$ is countable. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| space: S000217 | ||
| property: P000114 | ||
| value: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| By construction. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| space: S000217 | ||
| property: P000196 | ||
| value: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| By construction. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| space: S000217 | ||
| property: P000226 | ||
| value: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Since the ordinal numbers are well-ordered, | ||
| every nonempty collection of open sets has a minimal element. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@prabau since I saw you changed the definition, I copied the definition from S199 (left ray topology on$\omega$ ), so if you prefer this, maybe we should also change it there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One of the reasons I changed the definition is that the previous one had a problem. It claimed the collection of open sets was (apart from boundary cases) exactly all the "closed rays", and also was exactly all the "open rays". That does not quite work, due to limit ordinals below$\omega_1$ .
The new description (inspired by S166) also seemed more informative and easier to grasp.
Not sure I want to modify S199 here, but it could be helpful.