Skip to content

Conversation

@pointlessone
Copy link
Member

Since we already support BigDecimal in CFF we'll keep it. That said, it seems like a very farfetched scenario. It doesn't lay in the re-encoding path. It can only be there by manually construction a CFF Dict which is a very specific an unconventionl thing to do. Anyway, since a BigDecimal can only come from the user code we'll leave it to the user to add the dependency.

This is an alternative solution to #108.

Since we already support BigDecimal in CFF we'll keep it. That said, it
seems like a very farfetched scenario. It doesn't lay in the re-encoding
path. It can only be there by manually construction a CFF Dict which is
a very specific an unconventionl thing to do. Anyway, since a BigDecimal
can only come from the user code we'll leave it to the user to add the
dependency.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants