coderabbit test

[aidankmcalister]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Added a testing guide for CodeRabbit integration, outlining scenarios for code snippet handling, single-review enforcement, no art/poetry, scope limitation, duplicate resolution, and performance checks, plus CI/CD validation notes.

• Chores

  • Introduced a minimal CodeRabbit configuration to standardize review behavior, set language defaults, enable streamlined auto-reviews, and disable creative outputs.

[github-actions]

Dangerous URL check

No absolute URLs to prisma.io/docs found.
No local URLs found.

[github-actions]

original	preview
content/800-guides/550-test-guide.mdx	content/800-guides/550-test-guide.mdx

[github-actions]

Redirect check

This PR probably requires the following redirects to be added to static/_redirects:

• This PR does not change any pages in a way that would require a redirect.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Adds a new CodeRabbit configuration file and a new documentation guide detailing testing scenarios for review behavior. No source code or public APIs were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
Configuration \.coderabbit.yaml	Introduces a minimal CodeRabbit config: sets language, review feature toggles, enables auto_review (drafts disabled), disables chat art and finishing unit tests.
Documentation content/800-guides/550-test-guide.mdx	Adds a testing guide describing multiple review behavior test cases, including snippet handling, single-review enforcement, no art/poetry, scope limits, duplicate avoidance, and performance considerations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title “coderabbit test” is too vague to convey the primary changes—namely adding a .coderabbit.yaml configuration and a detailed test guide—and does not clearly summarize the pull request’s intent.	Please update the title to clearly describe the main change, for example “Add Coderabbit configuration file and integration test guide.”

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch DC-5263-coderabbit

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying docs with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	b75a3b8
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://f0b3c185.docs-51g.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://dc-5263-coderabbit.docs-51g.pages.dev

View logs

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c20a86 and b75a3b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
• content/800-guides/550-test-guide.mdx (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: runner / linkspector
• GitHub Check: Check internal links
• GitHub Check: Lost Pixel

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Invalid schema for finishing_touches.unit_tests (boolean used instead of object).

Per the provided schema, finishing_touches.unit_tests must be an object with an enabled boolean. Using false directly may be ignored or fail validation.

Apply this fix:

-finishing_touches:
-  unit_tests: false
+finishing_touches:
+  unit_tests:
+    enabled: false

As per the provided schema

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	finishing_touches:
	unit_tests: false
	finishing_touches:
	unit_tests:
	enabled: false

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

.coderabbit.yaml around lines 19-20: finishing_touches.unit_tests is currently a
bare boolean which violates the schema; replace the boolean with an object
containing an enabled boolean (e.g., set finishing_touches.unit_tests: {
enabled: false } or { enabled: true } as intended) so the key conforms to the
required object shape.