Check that dependencies colors are as expected after query execution

[Zoxc]

This checks that dep node dependencies are colored as expected after execution. It also marks no_hash queries with the expected color, similarly to #150156.

I was thinking this might be useful as a sample based sanity check.

[Zoxc]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 494092e (494092e44909ce3fb9b29de7db227caf02fc6118, parent: f134bbc78dac04a17324341a8d4a15a6930d81a7)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (494092e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.9%]	36
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.0%, 0.9%]	71
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.9%]	36

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -1.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.8%	[0.9%, 2.7%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.6%	[-6.9%, -4.7%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary -1.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.9%	[1.9%, 1.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.8%	[3.0%, 4.9%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.4%	[-2.0%, -0.8%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.6%	[-6.7%, -3.2%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-2.0%, 1.9%]	3

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	4

Bootstrap: 472.065s -> 481.54s (2.01%)
Artifact size: 383.58 MiB -> 385.98 MiB (0.63%)