Skip to content

Conversation

@akashsonune
Copy link
Member

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why. Add relevant
screenshots and reference related issues via Closes #XY or Related to #XY.


@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @akashsonune, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant refactoring of the SiFormItemComponent and its associated control interface. The primary goal is to enhance consistency and accessibility by making the label input and errormessageId property explicitly required. This change streamlines the component's API, ensuring that all form items consistently provide essential structural and accessibility information. The update includes necessary adjustments to existing examples and internal wrappers to comply with these new requirements, improving overall code quality and maintainability.

Highlights

  • API Changes for SiFormItemComponent: The label input for SiFormItemComponent has been updated to be a required input, ensuring all form items explicitly define their labels.
  • API Changes for SiFormItemControl: The errormessageId property in the SiFormItemControl interface is now mandatory, promoting better accessibility by requiring a generated ID for error messages.
  • Example Updates: All relevant examples and internal wrappers have been updated to comply with the new required label input and errormessageId property, including providing default or specific label values.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the si-form-item component to make its label property required, which is a good step towards better accessibility and component API clarity. It also makes errormessageId required on the SiFormItemControl interface. The changes across the codebase correctly adapt to these new requirements.

I've left a couple of suggestions in src/app/examples/si-application-header/si-launchpad.html where the si-form-item usage could be further improved by following the excellent refactoring pattern you've already applied in src/app/examples/si-localization/si-localization.html. Instead of using an empty label as a workaround, moving the existing label text to the si-form-item would be more idiomatic and better for accessibility. Additionally, removing the id attribute from input elements within si-form-item is recommended as it is automatically generated.

@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch 2 times, most recently from 4318d97 to cb824e8 Compare January 28, 2026 18:33
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2026

@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch 2 times, most recently from 51c2d84 to 1924b5f Compare January 29, 2026 08:47
@akashsonune akashsonune marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2026 09:27
@akashsonune akashsonune requested review from a team as code owners January 29, 2026 09:27
@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch 3 times, most recently from cf0bbce to 543e63a Compare January 29, 2026 12:29
@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch 2 times, most recently from 0cdbe61 to d08059d Compare January 29, 2026 14:08
@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch 2 times, most recently from 4d5235f to 84fe005 Compare January 29, 2026 14:39
@spike-rabbit spike-rabbit force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch from 84fe005 to 42fe8b3 Compare January 29, 2026 15:05
@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch 3 times, most recently from da54afa to 68172a9 Compare January 29, 2026 17:43
@akashsonune akashsonune force-pushed the refactor/improve-form-item-usage-in-examples branch from 68172a9 to caec0c8 Compare January 29, 2026 18:16
@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage

@akashsonune
Copy link
Member Author

@spike-rabbit can you check now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants