squid:S1118 - Utility classes should not have public constructors #87
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
I am not sure whether you do not agree with these changes or not. Please close this PR if not. |
Member
|
Hey @m-ezzat. Really sorry about delay. Well, I am not big fan of this rule. For me those constructors are unnecessary. But I would like to know your opinion. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request is focused on resolving occurrences of Sonar rule squid:S1118 - Utility classes should not have public constructors
You can find more information about the issue here: https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/coding_rules#q=squid:S1118
Please let me know if you have any questions.
M-Ezzat