-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
[MIST-1131] Implement recovery-based scale out #1137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
taegeonum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've left some comments. Thanks!
| "type": "double" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "NumEventProcessors", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need this information?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't we send the group load info from Task by dividing the load by the number of event processors?
| innerList.add(taskHostname); | ||
| return innerMap.putIfAbsent(taskHostname, TaskStats.newBuilder() | ||
| .setTaskLoad(0.0) | ||
| .setNumEventProcessors(1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is set to 1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happen if a task fails before it is updated?
This PR resolves #1131 via