Improve CONTRIBUTING.md for Clarity, Onboarding & Architectural Rigor #32
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔍 Problem Statement
The existing CONTRIBUTING.md for SpectraGraph is philosophically strong and technically accurate, but it places a high cognitive load on new contributors.
First-time contributors—especially those unfamiliar with strict, multi-service, ethics-driven architectures—may struggle to quickly understand where changes belong, what rules are non-negotiable, and how to submit a reviewable PR.
🎯 Objectives
This PR refines the contributing documentation to:
Reduce onboarding friction for new contributors
Improve scannability and navigation through clearer structure and hierarchy
Explicitly separate rules, requirements, and guidance
Reinforce SpectraGraph’s production-grade, security-conscious, and ethics-first stance
Align the documentation with standards seen in mature OSINT / security-focused open-source projects
🛠️ Solution
This update restructures and clarifies CONTRIBUTING.md without changing project policy or philosophy:
Introduces a clear narrative flow: philosophy → architecture → rules → setup → contribution paths
Makes architectural boundaries and dependency rules explicit and non-ambiguous
Adds strong visual hierarchy (sections, warnings, checklists) for faster scanning
Clearly documents where specific types of changes must live
Reinforces ethical and security expectations with explicit “do not” guidance
Improves contributor confidence by setting clear expectations for PR quality and review criteria
✅ Impact
Faster onboarding for new contributors
Fewer mis-scoped PRs and architectural violations
Clearer expectations for reviews and approvals
Stronger signal that SpectraGraph is a serious, production-grade OSINT platform
🧪 Scope & Risk
Documentation-only change
No code, behavior, or policy changes
No backward compatibility concerns