Skip to content

Conversation

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member

@mulkieran mulkieran commented Dec 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved error reporting performance through internal optimizations.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@mulkieran mulkieran self-assigned this Dec 6, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The _interpret_errors_2 function in the error reporting module is refactored to cache the result of next_error.get_dbus_name() in a local variable and reuse it for multiple comparisons, eliminating redundant method calls while preserving original control flow and behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Error reporting optimization
src/stratis_cli/_error_reporting.py
Cached get_dbus_name() result in local variable dbus_name within _interpret_errors_2 to avoid repeated method calls during D-Bus error type comparisons

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Use identifier for the name of the D-Bus error' directly describes the main refactoring change: storing the D-Bus error name in an identifier variable to avoid repeated method calls.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a67671 and a296254.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/stratis_cli/_error_reporting.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: test-runs (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: test-runs (3.13)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/stratis_cli/_error_reporting.py (1)

285-344: LGTM! Solid refactoring that improves performance and consistency.

Caching get_dbus_name() in a local variable eliminates redundant method calls and makes this function consistent with the pattern already established in _interpret_errors_0 (line 116). The refactoring preserves all original logic while improving code maintainability.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mulkieran mulkieran moved this to In Progress (long term) in 2025December Dec 10, 2025
@mulkieran
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai config

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@mulkieran: I'll fetch the current CodeRabbit configuration for this repository, including the configuration schema and any configuration errors if present.


🛠 Debug Information Gathered


@mulkieran: Here's your current CodeRabbit configuration for this repository:

Product Settings

  • Tier: Pro (as an open source project)

Key Configuration Settings

Reviews

  • Profile: Chill (less strict feedback)
  • Auto Review: ✅ Enabled (including incremental reviews)
  • Request Changes Workflow: ❌ Disabled
  • High-Level Summary: ✅ Enabled in PR description
  • Poem: ✅ Enabled
  • Suggested Labels: ✅ Enabled
  • Suggested Reviewers: ✅ Enabled
  • Auto Apply Labels: ❌ Disabled
  • Auto Assign Reviewers: ❌ Disabled

Static Analysis Tools (All Enabled)

  • ShellCheck, Ruff, Markdownlint, LanguageTool
  • GitHub Checks integration
  • Biome, Hadolint, golangci-lint, yamllint
  • Gitleaks, Checkov, ESLint, Clippy
  • And many more...

Pre-merge Checks

  • Docstring Coverage: Warning mode (80% threshold)
  • Title Check: Warning mode
  • Description Check: Warning mode
  • Issue Assessment: Warning mode
  • Custom Checks: None configured

Knowledge Base

  • Web Search: ✅ Enabled
  • Code Guidelines: ✅ Enabled (no custom file patterns)
  • Learnings Scope: Auto
  • Issues/PRs Scope: Auto

Code Generation

  • Docstrings: ✅ Enabled (en-US)
  • Unit Tests: ✅ Enabled

Customizations

  • No custom path filters
  • No custom path instructions
  • No custom labeling instructions
  • No custom pre-merge checks

You're currently using the default configuration with all features enabled. Would you like to customize any of these settings? For example, I can help you:

  • Add path-based review instructions
  • Configure custom labeling rules
  • Set up path filters to exclude certain files
  • Adjust pre-merge check requirements
  • Customize linting tool settings

Just let me know what you'd like to change!

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member Author

mulkieran commented Dec 11, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.
🧩 Analysis chain

@mulkieran: Here's your current CodeRabbit configuration for this repository:

Product Settings

* **Tier**: Pro (as an open source project)

Key Configuration Settings

Reviews

* **Profile**: Chill (less strict feedback)

* **Auto Review**: ✅ Enabled (including incremental reviews)

* **Request Changes Workflow**: ❌ Disabled

* **High-Level Summary**: ✅ Enabled in PR description

* **Poem**: ✅ Enabled

* **Suggested Labels**: ✅ Enabled

* **Suggested Reviewers**: ✅ Enabled

* **Auto Apply Labels**: ❌ Disabled

* **Auto Assign Reviewers**: ❌ Disabled

Static Analysis Tools (All Enabled)

* ShellCheck, Ruff, Markdownlint, LanguageTool

* GitHub Checks integration

* Biome, Hadolint, golangci-lint, yamllint

* Gitleaks, Checkov, ESLint, Clippy

* And many more...

Pre-merge Checks

* **Docstring Coverage**: Warning mode (80% threshold)

* **Title Check**: Warning mode

* **Description Check**: Warning mode

* **Issue Assessment**: Warning mode

* **Custom Checks**: None configured

Knowledge Base

* **Web Search**: ✅ Enabled

* **Code Guidelines**: ✅ Enabled (no custom file patterns)

* **Learnings Scope**: Auto

* **Issues/PRs Scope**: Auto

Code Generation

* **Docstrings**: ✅ Enabled (en-US)

* **Unit Tests**: ✅ Enabled

Customizations

* No custom path filters

* No custom path instructions

* No custom labeling instructions

* No custom pre-merge checks

You're currently using the default configuration with all features enabled. Would you like to customize any of these settings? For example, I can help you:

* Add path-based review instructions

* Configure custom labeling rules

* Set up path filters to exclude certain files

* Adjust pre-merge check requirements

* Customize linting tool settings

Just let me know what you'd like to change!

@coderabbitai I'ld like to turn auto review and poem off.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@mulkieran: I can help you disable auto review and poem! You'll need to add or update the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file in the root of your repository with the following settings:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    enabled: false
  poem: false

Steps to apply this configuration:

  1. Create or edit the .coderabbit.yaml file in the root of your repository
  2. Add the above configuration
  3. Commit and push the changes
  4. The settings will take effect on the next PR or when you trigger a review

Alternatively, you can also manage these settings through the CodeRabbit UI at:

  • Auto Review: Repository Settings → Reviews → Auto Review
  • Poem: Repository Settings → Reviews → Poem

Once you've made these changes, auto reviews will no longer trigger automatically on new PRs, and poems will no longer be included in PR summaries. You can still manually request reviews by mentioning me with commands like @coderabbitai review.

Let me know if you need any help with the configuration!

Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
@mulkieran mulkieran force-pushed the issue-stratisd-2576 branch from 6323d3b to a296254 Compare January 2, 2026 17:49
@mulkieran mulkieran marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2026 17:49
@mulkieran
Copy link
Member Author

rebased.

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@mulkieran mulkieran moved this from In Progress (long term) to In Review in 2025December Jan 2, 2026
@mulkieran mulkieran added this to the v3.9.0 milestone Jan 2, 2026
@mulkieran
Copy link
Member Author

This is a tiny code improvement step, so we might as well just merge and clear the board.

@mulkieran mulkieran merged commit ca0a8f3 into stratis-storage:master Jan 2, 2026
9 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in 2025December Jan 2, 2026
@mulkieran mulkieran deleted the issue-stratisd-2576 branch January 2, 2026 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant