Skip to content

Conversation

@HaswathaSridharan
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • For Problem 1 (Top Travellers), the solution correctly uses a LEFT JOIN to include users who haven't taken any rides, and the IFNULL function properly handles NULL values for distance. The grouping and ordering are also correct.
    • For Problem 2 (Apples & Oranges), the solution correctly calculates the difference between apple and orange sales for each date. The join condition and filtering are appropriate.
  2. Time Complexity:

    • Both solutions involve JOIN operations and GROUP BY clauses, which typically have O(N log N) complexity where N is the number of rows in the tables.
    • The ordering operations add additional O(N log N) complexity.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • Both solutions require space proportional to the number of rows in the result set, which is O(N) in the worst case.
  4. Code Quality:

    • The code is generally well-structured and readable.
    • For Problem 2, the use of aliases 'a' and 'b' could be more descriptive (e.g., 'apple_sales' and 'orange_sales').
    • The WHERE clause in Problem 2 could be simplified to a.fruit = 'apples' and b.fruit = 'oranges' since we're checking for exact matches.
    • Consistent indentation would improve readability.
  5. Efficiency:

    • Both solutions are efficient for typical SQL operations.
    • For Problem 2, an alternative approach using conditional aggregation (CASE statements) might be more readable and potentially more efficient:
      SELECT sale_date,
             SUM(CASE WHEN fruit = 'apples' THEN sold_num ELSE 0 END) - 
             SUM(CASE WHEN fruit = 'oranges' THEN sold_num ELSE 0 END) AS diff
      FROM Sales
      GROUP BY sale_date
      ORDER BY sale_date

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants