Thomas' improved fan curve #550
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
FAN_POINT(40, 15), \ FAN_POINT(44, 16), \ FAN_POINT(48, 17), \ FAN_POINT(52, 18), \ FAN_POINT(56, 21), \ FAN_POINT(60, 26), \ FAN_POINT(63, 31), \ FAN_POINT(66, 36), \ FAN_POINT(69, 41), \ FAN_POINT(72, 48), \ FAN_POINT(75, 56), \ FAN_POINT(78, 64), \ FAN_POINT(81, 72), \ FAN_POINT(84, 81), \ FAN_POINT(87, 90), \ FAN_POINT(90, 100), \ The new fan behavior is even better with fan points that span just more than the change threshold. This should have engineering review to see if the top end mark for full fans at 90C is good or should be adjusted for older Intel models that thermal throttle before than (ie, at 85C). Docs from Intel are not great to know where the thermal points for CPU engage.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update most boards to a new fan curve for both the CPU and GPU fan to:
FAN_POINT(40, 15), \ FAN_POINT(44, 16), \ FAN_POINT(48, 17),
FAN_POINT(52, 18), \ FAN_POINT(56, 21), \ FAN_POINT(60, 26),
FAN_POINT(63, 31), \ FAN_POINT(66, 36), \ FAN_POINT(69, 41),
FAN_POINT(72, 48), \ FAN_POINT(75, 56), \ FAN_POINT(78, 64),
FAN_POINT(81, 72), \ FAN_POINT(84, 81), \ FAN_POINT(87, 90),
FAN_POINT(90, 100), \
The new fan behavior is even better with fan points that span just more
than the change threshold. This should have engineering review to see if
the top end mark for full fans at 90C is good or should be adjusted for
older Intel models that thermal throttle before than (ie, at 85C). Docs
from Intel are not great to know where the thermal points for CPU
engage.