Skip to content

Conversation

@Tim-Dieringer
Copy link
Collaborator

Added command to start ZMQ server, which listens for requests from Metric Proxy. Includes variable port, argument usage from the Proxy, MessagePack serialization/deserialization and uses either parallel execution for multiple metrics or normal execution for a single metric.
This is a complementary feature to https://github.com/A-Tarraf/proxy_v2/tree/feature_ftio and is related to Issue #13 .

@A-Tarraf A-Tarraf self-assigned this Jan 8, 2026
@A-Tarraf A-Tarraf added the feature feature request label Jan 8, 2026
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this actually used, or do you use the prediction server already implemented in FTIO?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ftio/api/metric_proxy/proxy_zmq.py is a zmq server to specifically support what metric proxy needs, so it is used. It's probably possible to change proxy_zmq.py to rely on some of the already implemented functions instead of using a complete custom method but that would require refactoring.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this is fine. We can keep it this way. I would just suggest that you document these points alongside some instructions (e.g., call tree?) in a seperate file for FTIO as described here: https://github.com/tuda-parallel/FTIO/blob/feature/pattern_change_detection/docs/students_contribute.md#-module-documentation-and-licensing. Also maybe you can add some test cases so that we do not break these functionalites in the future with newer commits (https://github.com/tuda-parallel/FTIO/blob/feature/pattern_change_detection/docs/students_contribute.md#-module-documentation-and-licensing)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature feature request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants