Skip to content

Conversation

@codyshoffner
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Update some defaults in the template that have gotten stale.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Other (security config, docs update, etc)

Checklist before merging

@codyshoffner codyshoffner requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2026 21:58
Copy link
Contributor

@nywilken nywilken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a first past this looks good to get rid of things that are no longer needed or outdated. I left a nit and a question.

That said, I found the mixing of Must with Should and May to be a bit confusing since they are all under the Must Have section.

For a second pass, It would be great to cluster the requirements into capability-based groupings that need to be met. For Example:

  • Networking & Service Exposure
  • Identity & Access Management (SSO/Keyclock)
  • Security & Hardening
  • UDS Core Interoperability
  • Testing …
  • Configuration …

Co-authored-by: Wilken Rivera <1749304+nywilken@users.noreply.github.com>
@codyshoffner codyshoffner marked this pull request as draft January 26, 2026 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants