fix(cardano): Remove redundant redeemer field from Multiasset #178
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wolf31o2
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
Member
|
I think that the problem here is that the Instead, it could point to a One of the simplifications of u5c over the CDDL that I really like is to link redeemers to the specific data payloads they act upon (eg: Spend redeemers with their input) |
carbolymer
force-pushed
the
remove-redundant-redeemer
branch
from
cc90e50 to
749e6b2
Compare
scarmuega
merged commit 17a7650
into
utxorpc:chore/initialize-v1beta
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Redeemers don't really belong to multiassets, so the field is redundant at this place.
In general redeemers should be included in the transaction witnesses: https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger/blob/master/eras/conway/impl/cddl-files/conway.cddl#L689
The field is reintroduced in #181 in
WitnessSettype.