-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
Bootloop detection platform factoring #4853
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
DedeHai
merged 5 commits into
wled:main
from
willmmiles:bootloop-platform-simplification
Sep 1, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5146926
Use direct references to RTC RAM on ESP8266
willmmiles 85d4db8
Isolate platform differences in bootloop check
willmmiles 46f3bc0
Bootloop: Include soft wdt on ESP8266
willmmiles dd13c2d
Reset crash counter after long interval
willmmiles 6f914d7
Increase boot loop timeout
willmmiles File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide a no-op bootloopCheckOTA() on ESP8266 to avoid cross-platform call sites needing ifdefs.
Right now the symbol only exists on non-ESP8266. A stub keeps call sites clean.
Apply:
Also applies to: 841-851
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd considered it; honestly doing it that way would generally be my preferred style. Unfortunately, given that the body and caller are in separate translation units, the empty call cannot be inlined away, so the result would be a small waste of limited code memory bytes on ESP8266 systems for nothing but code aesthetic reasons. Given that the extra #ifdefs are already in the code, the best value is to leave them alone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@willmmiles That's a very valid point about the memory constraints on ESP8266 systems. You're absolutely right that the function call overhead would be wasteful when every byte of code memory counts, especially since the compiler can't inline away calls across translation units. The practical consideration of limited flash memory definitely outweighs the aesthetic benefits of a unified API in this case. Thanks for the explanation!
✏️ Learnings added