Skip to content

Conversation

@HyperCodec
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@HyperCodec HyperCodec added the enhancement New feature or request label May 3, 2025
@HyperCodec HyperCodec self-assigned this May 3, 2025
@HyperCodec
Copy link
Owner Author

Still need to do tracing trait and documentation.

@HyperCodec
Copy link
Owner Author

Macros also need fixing from the errors. I think i should just completely rewrite that crate because I was new to proc macros back then.

@HyperCodec HyperCodec linked an issue May 3, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@HyperCodec HyperCodec mentioned this pull request May 3, 2025
@HyperCodec HyperCodec linked an issue May 3, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@HyperCodec
Copy link
Owner Author

Because of the Eliminator API, I might actually be able to accept a generic number type.

@HyperCodec
Copy link
Owner Author

hmm doing so would be a rather large refactor, and I don't know if there's really a need for more types. I think i'll make an issue about it an consider it later.

@HyperCodec
Copy link
Owner Author

might return to this crate and neat after a few more weeks once i have more free time

@HyperCodec HyperCodec merged commit c688b6c into dev Oct 6, 2025
3 checks passed
@HyperCodec HyperCodec deleted the split-nextgens branch October 6, 2025 16:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Split up nextgens Prunable isn't really necessary Rename traits?

2 participants